SAIF Corp. v. January’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
July 2019
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“if medical evidence- i.e. , a physician's expert opinion-establishes that the symptomatic worsening represents an actual worsening of the underlying condition, such evidence may carry the worker's burden.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“in all events, a medical expert's opinion that an increase of symptoms signifies an actual worsening of a particular compensable condition satisfies the actual worsening standard”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“opinion is persuasive [is] for the Board to determine,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.