State v. Tobin’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
24 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently January 2025
24 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Washington v. Recuenco · 154 Wash. 2d 118 - State v. Hughes · 116 Wash. 2d 917 - State v. Davison · Crosby v. County of Spokane · 69 Wash. App. 189 - State v. Johnson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Restitution shall be ordered whenever the offender is convicted of an offense which results in injury to any person or damage to or loss of property or as provided in subsection (6) of this section unless extraordinary circumstances exist which make restitution inappropriate in the court’s judgment and the court sets forth such circumstances in the record.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[R]estitution ordered by a court pursuant to a criminal conviction shall be based on easily ascertainable damages for injury to or loss of property, actual expenses incurred for treatment for injury to persons, and lost wages resulting from injury.... The amount of restitution shall not exceed double the amount of the offender’s gain or the victim’s loss from the commission of the crime.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“recognize that they were intended to require the defendant to face the consequences of his or her criminal conduct.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Romish
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.