Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

166 So. 2d 230

Armbruster v. Armbruster

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1964-07-14

Relies on Bailey v. Bailey

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1964-07-14

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently May 1995

7 state decisions

301964197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1Appellant-husband appeals from that portion of a divorce decree which dealt with the amount of alimony and child support awarded to appellee-wife.

¶2Appellant contends that the chancellor awarded the wife too much, in that, there is not enough money left for appellant to support himself.

¶3The briefs have raised only issues of fact which were decided by the chancellor on conflicting testimony. Our study of the record reveals that there was ample competent evidence to support his award. Appellant has not shown that the chancellor abused his discretion in making the award. Bailey v. Bailey, Fla.App.1961, 126 So.2d 165.

¶4Affirmed.

/166/so2d/230 · .json · Public domain