Glass v. Glass’s Empirical Analysis
1964
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
February 1975
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Chastain v. Chastain · 112 So. 2d 411 - Fowler v. Fowler · Webber v. Webber · 54 So. 2d 36 - Schiff v. Schiff · 38 So. 2d 465 - Cohn v. Mann
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““[W]henever any husband * * * has pursuant to the decree of any court of competent jurisdiction been required to make to his wife any * * * payments [of alimony] and the circumstances of the parties or the financial ability of the husband shall have been changed since the * * * rendition of such decree, * * * the court, after giving both parties an opportunity to be heard, * * * shall make such order * * * as justice and equity shall require, with due regard to the changed circumstances and the financial ability of the husband, decreasing or increasing * * * the amount of * * * alimony provided for * * * in such decree.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Bagley v. Bagley · Knight v. Knight
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.