¶1Appellant’s motion for relief under Criminal Procedure Rule. No. 1, F.S.A. ch. 924 Appendix, denial of which is here appealed, sought to vacate sentences entered in Orange County which would “run consecutive to” sentences imposed in Volusia County. Accordingly, it is apparent on the face of the motion that relief under Rule No. 1 is not presently available, the motion was properly denied and the denial is affirmed.
166 So. 2d 775
Cummings v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided August 12, 1964
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1964-08-12
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently December 1966
3 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1964-08-12
View the full empirical analysis of this case →