Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 166 So. 2d 892 - State v. Weeks

166 So. 2d 892 - State v. Weeks’s Empirical Analysis

1964

Citation profile

109
cited by 109 later decisions
5
states following
October 2013
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 108 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 109 later decisions — most recently October 2013 · most notably 878 So. 2d 1236 - Baker v. State (2004), 747 So. 2d 931 - Steele v. Kehoe (1999)

1 federal appellate · 108 state decisions

550196419701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Gideon v. Wainwright · Townsend v. Sain · Douglas v. People of State of California · Sanders v. United States · Heflin v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 109 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[postconviction] remedies are subject to the more flexible standards of due process announced in the Fifth Amendment, Constitution of the United States.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “the assistance of counsel is essential to accomplish a fair and thorough presentation”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. ““This means that in these collatoral proceedings there is no absolute right to assistance of a lawyer. Nevertheless, Fifth Amendment due process would require such assistance if the post conviction motion presents apparently substantial meritorious claims for relief ...” (emphasis added)”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.