Brown v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2015
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
July 2016
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State ex rel. Szabo Food Services, Inc. of North Carolina v. Dickinson · 143 So. 3d 981 - Harvey M. Hill v. State · Hynes v. State · 75 So. 3d 810 - State v. Morival
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“To prove the* crime of Aggravated Animal Cruelty, the State must prove the following two elements beyond a reasonable doubt: ' 1. (Defendant) [intentionally committed an act 'to an animal] [or] [owned or had custody or control of an animal and failed to act]. 2. (Defendant’s) [act] [or] [failure to act] resulted in [excessive or repeated infliction of unnecessary pain] [or] [suffering to the animal" or the animal’s cruel death].”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.