Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 166 SW 99 - Luckenbach v. Thomas

Luckenbach v. Thomas’s Empirical Analysis

1914

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
2
states following
April 1985
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 26 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently April 1985 · most notably Perry v. Stewart Title Co. (1985), Chalk v. Daggett (1924)

2 federal appellate · 26 state decisions

8019141920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on George v. Hesse · Jones v. George · J. H. Milliken & Co. v. Callahan County · Coverdill v. Seymour · 23 Tex. Civ. App. 629 - Wells v. Houston

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““This appears to be a clear case of the defendant making an election not to repudiate the sale, as he dealt with the property as his own, after discovery of the fraud, if any fraud existed, and failed to promptly tender reconveyance and demand a rescission.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““If there be one affirmative fact important to a recovery by plaintiffs not admitted by defendant, plaintiff has the right to open and conclude.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.