Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 166 SW3D 114 - MacE v. Loetel

MacE v. Loetel’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
April 2012
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Murphy v. Carron · City National Bank & Trust Co. v. Graves · Godsy v. Godsy · Hodges v. Hodges · Estate of Gross v. Gross

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The standard of proof in a discovery of assets proceeding is that of `clear, convincing, and cogent evidence'... As a result, in order for the trial court's judgment to be supported by substantial evidence, the evidence must also be clear, cogent, and convincing”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.