166 Tex. Crim. 3 - Feagin v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1957
Citation profile
3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently June 1973
3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 134 Tex. Crim. 500 - Walker v. State · 82 Tex. Crim. 85 - Ex Parte White · Stum v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Inasmuch as the caption, or title, to the amendment of 1957 made no reference to or gave no notice of any intent, by the proposed legislation, to thereby make mandatory the passage of sentence in misdemeanors, such construction is expressly prohibited because no notice thereof was expressed or contained in the caption.” 310 S.W.2d at 100 . See Ex parte Hayden, 152 Tex.Cr.R. 517 , 215 S.W.2d 620 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Whaley v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.