Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

166 Wash. 356

7 P.2d 15

State v. Jimas

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 18, 1932

Washington Supreme Court · decided 1932-01-18

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1932-01-18

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently November 2009

13 state decisions

2019321940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Tolman, C. J.,

¶1 (dissenting) — I recognize the wide discretion of the trial courts in such matters, and adhere to what is quoted by the majority from our previous decisions ; but even so, since to vindicate the authority of the courts and to do justice is, after all, more important than any financial consideration, in my judgment, the diligence here shown in returning the convicted man for punishment should be encouraged, to the end that like diligence be exercised in the future under like circumstances.

¶2 In the light of its probable influence upon bonding companies in the future, it was, in my opinion, an abuse of discretion not to set aside the forfeiture to the extent of the money necessarily expended in returning the fugitive to serve his sentence.

/166/wash/356 · .json · Public domain