State v. Hughes’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
December 2011
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Blakely v. Washington · Blockburger v. United States · Ball v. United States · 125 Wash. 2d 769 - State v. Calle · In Re Orange
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[r]egardless of whether nonconsent is proved by the age of the victim and the age differential between the victim and the perpetrator or by the mental incapacity or physical helplessness of the victim, both statutes protect individuals who are unable to consent by reason of their status.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. State v. Smith“If each offense includes an element not included in the other, and each requires proof of a fact the other does not, then the offenses are not constitutionally the same under this test.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Milam“our courts have specifically recognized that the legislature did not intend one act of sexual intercourse to violate both the rape and statutory rape provision of our code.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. State v. Smith
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.