166 Wis. 2d 481 - McCarthy v. Elections Board’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Democratic Party of United States v. Wisconsin Ex Rel. La Follette · 117 Wis. 2d 351 - Labor & Farm Party v. Elections Board · 93 Wis. 2d 473 - State Ex Rel. La Follette v. Democratic Party of United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“was based on the Selection Committee's having properly applied the statutory standard of media advocacy or recognition”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“failure to exercise at all the discretion conferred upon it by statute constitutes an abuse of that discretion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“that the Selection Committee's decision not to certify the subject candidate's name for ballot placement”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.