Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 166 W. Va. 173 - St. Clair v. St. Clair

166 W. Va. 173 - St. Clair v. St. Clair’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
2
states following
January 2008
most recently cited

18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently January 2008

18 state decisions

140198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 128 W. Va. 198 - Taylor v. Taylor · 155 W. Va. 368 - Annon v. Lucas · 151 W. Va. 274 - Belcher v. Belcher · 134 W. Va. 94 - Finnegan v. Finnegan · 141 W. Va. 43 - Witt v. Witt

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"In a divorce suit the finding of fact of a trial chancellor based on conflicting evidence will not be disturbed on appeal unless it is clearly wrong or against the preponderance of the evidence."”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Upon ordering a divorce, the court may make such further order as it shall deem expedient, concerning the maintenance of the parties, or either of them; and upon ordering the annulment of a marriage, or a divorce, the court may make such further order as it shall deem expedient, concerning the care, custody, education and maintenance of the minor children, and may determine with which of the parents or other proper person or persons the children or any of them, may remain.... Upon ordering the annulment of a marriage or a divorce, the court may, in its discretion, make such further order as it shall deem expedient, concerning the grant of reasonable visitation rights to any grandparent of the minor children upon application, if the grandparent or grandparents are related to such minor child through a party to such action whose whereabouts are unknown or through a party who did not answer or otherwise appear and defend the cause of action in which such divorce or annulment is granted, and the court may issue any necessary order to enforce such order or decree.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.