Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 166 W. Va. 690 - State v. Boyd

166 W. Va. 690 - State v. Boyd’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
3
states following
May 2003
most recently cited

23 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently May 2003

23 state decisions

100198119902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Craig v. Harney · Ex parte Hudgings · In the Matter of Criminal Contempt of Thomas C McConnell · In the Matter of Larry Little · Eaton v. City of Tulsa

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The rule with regard to contempt of court by an attorney begins with a recognition, that under our adversary system of justice, zealous advocacy on the part of an attorney must be permitted. Consequently, it is only when his conduct is boisterous or disrespectful to the degree that it constitutes an imminent threat to the administration of justice that summary punishment for contempt will be authorized.””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[m]isbehavior in the presence of the court, or so near thereto, as to obstruct or interrupt the administration of justice.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[B]efore the drastic procedures of the summary contempt power may be invoked to replace the protections of ordinary constitutional procedures there must be an actual obstruction of justice: "An obstruction to the performance of judicial duty resulting from an act done in the presence of the court is, then, the characteristic upon which the power to punish for contempt must rest. This being true, it follows that the presence of that element must clearly be shown in every case where the power to punish for contempt is exerted...."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.