Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 167 A2D 892 - Walton v. Lloyd

Walton v. Lloyd’s Empirical Analysis

1961

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
August 1965
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co. · Murray v. Dietz

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Our first question is a jurisdictional one, growing out of the fact that a motion for a new trial was filed out of time. Appellee says the trial court had no jurisdiction to entertain it. He also argues that this court has no jurisdiction to entertain the appeal because it was filed more than 10 days after the date on which the judgment should have been entered in the absence of a motion for a new trial. Citing Murray v. Dietz, D.C.Mun.App., 158 A.2d 908 . * * * The appeals were noted within 10 days from the date of actual entry of judgments. We think we are not without power to review those judgments.” 167 A.2d 892 -893.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.