State v. Actavis Pharma, Inc. & a.’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife · Young v. United States Ex Rel. Vuitton Et Fils S. A. · Marshall v. Jerrico, Inc. · Birch Broadcasting, Inc. v. Capitol Broadcasting Corp. · Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. Main Hurdman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Standing under the New Hampshire Constitution requires parties to have personal legal or equitable rights that are adverse to one another, with regard to an actual, not hypothetical, dispute, which is capable of judicial redress.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[b]ecause the alleged injury - an investigation allegedly inherently biased by [the outside counsel's] participation - cannot fairly be traced to the challenged violation - the State's failure to obtain legislative and executive approval before retaining outside counsel on a contingency fee basis.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Neither an abstract interest in ensuring that the State Constitution is observed nor an injury indistinguishable from a generalized wrong allegedly suffered by the public at large is sufficient to constitute a personal, concrete interest.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.