Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 167 A.D. 604 - Peuser v. Marsh

Peuser v. Marsh’s Empirical Analysis

1915

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
October 2002
most recently cited

2 federal appellate ·

Appellate journey

Relationships

Relies on Richard Deeves & Son v. Manhattan Life Insurance · Crowe v. . Liquid Carbonic Co. · Roach v. . Curtis · Sinnott v. . Feiock · McCormick Harvesting Machine Co. v. Hill

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a] keeping back something which is due, because there is an equitable reason to withhold it”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.