Rapelye v. Coupe

¶1Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concurred, except Lambert, J., who dissented upon the grounds: 1. That there is no proof in the case supporting or tending to support the “ sixth,” “seventh” and “eighth” findings of fact. 2. That the conclusions of law numbered consecutively and inclusive of findings “first” to “eighth” are without warrant of law and ineffectual to sustain the judgment here in review. 3. That the judgment is contrary to law.