Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 167 ALA 461 - Smith v. Pitts

Smith v. Pitts’s Empirical Analysis

1910

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
1
states following
August 2007
most recently cited

22 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently August 2007

22 state decisions

401910192019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Knighton v. Curry · Keel v. Larkin · Owen v. McGehee · Bragg v. Patterson · Lee's Adm'rs v. Fontaine

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"Since the surety's cause of action, in such cases, does not accrue until he has paid the debt of his principal, neither the statute of limitations nor adverse possession will begin to run until such payment. [Citations omitted.]"”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.