In Re Basham’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently July 2014 · most notably In Re Hudson (2001), In Re Dennis (1999)
1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 1301 · 11 U.S.C. § 1322 · 11 U.S.C. § 1325 · 11 U.S.C. § 1327 · 11 U.S.C. § 502
Relies on Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. · Simmons v. Savell · In re Szostek · Hein v. Ruti-Sweetwater, Inc. · In the Matter of Gerald Lewis Tarnow Appeal of Commodity Credit Corporation
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Looking to the contents of the notice to determine if the notice is reasonably calculated, under the circumstances, to apprise interested parties that their rights may be modified, is a flexible approach that encompasses the totality of circumstances presented in each case. Such approach allows the Court to consider a creditor’s sophistication, the amount of their involvement in the bankruptcy proceeding, as well as, that creditor’s reliance on the claims allowance procedures as demonstrated by a proof of claim filed before plan confirmation.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.