Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 167 Cal. 372 - Poggi v. Scott

Poggi v. Scott’s Empirical Analysis

1914

Citation profile

100
cited by 100 later decisions
9
states following
August 2019
most recently cited

12 federal appellate · 2 district · 70 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 100 later decisions — most recently August 2019 · most notably 51 Cal. 3d 120 - Moore v. Regents of University of California (1990), Collin v. American Empire Insurance (1994)

12 federal appellate · 2 district · 70 state decisions

19019141920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Davis v. Tacoma Railway & Power Co. · Gibbs v. Chase · Isle Royale Mining Co. v. Hertin · Donahue v. Shippee · Cubit v. O'Dett

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 100 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “‘‘The foundation for the action of conversion rests neither in the knowledge nor the intent of the defendant. It rests upon the unwarranted interference by defendant with the dominion over the property of the plaintiff from which injury to the latter results. Therefore, neither good nor bad faith, neither care nor negligence, neither knowledge nor ignorance, are of the gist of the action. ‘The plaintiff’s right of redress no longer depends upon his showing, in any way, that the defendant did the act in question from wrongful motives, or generally speaking, even intentionally; and hence the want of such motives, or of intention, is no defense. Nor, indeed, is negligence any necessary part of the case. Here, then, is a class of cases in which the tort consists in the breach of what may be called an absolute duty; the act itself (in some cases it must have caused damage) is unlawful and redressible as a tort.’ ””
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.