Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 167 CALAPP2D 58 - Mills v. Ruppert

Mills v. Ruppert’s Empirical Analysis

1959

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
3
states following
May 2019
most recently cited

20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently May 2019

20 state decisions

801959196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 122 Cal. App. 2d 264 - Barkett v. Brucato · 89 Cal. App. 2d 474 - Werner v. Knoll · Butt v. Bertola · 19 Cal. App. Supp. 2d 767 - Inglis v. Garland

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Lessee, as a material part of the consideration to be rendered to lessor, hereby waives all claims against lessor for damages to goods, wares and merchandise, in, upon or about said premises and for injuries to persons in or about said premises, from any cause arising at any time, and lessee will hold lessor exempt and harmless from any damage or injury to any person, or to the goods, wares and merchandise of any person, arising from the use of the premises by lessee, or from the failure of lessee to keep the premises in good condition and repair, as herein provided.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.