167 Cal. App. 3d 413 - People v. Pendleton’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently March 2003
2 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Stovall v. Denno · 57 Cal. 2d 450 - Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior Court · 34 Cal. 3d 441 - People v. Dillon · 35 Cal. 3d 131 - Carlos v. Superior Court · 36 Cal. 3d 539 - People v. Garcia
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The 'pre-Harris ' rule can be stated as follows: 'Courts have repeatedly emphasized that no reliable conclusion can be drawn when total population rather than voter population is used as a base.' ") (citation omitted). 32 The court of appeal in Rhymes held that a defendant could base his prima facie case of jury under-representation on comparisons between minority representation on venires and their representation in the general population. Since the court of appeal's decision in Rhymes pre-dated Harris and since the California Supreme Court has held that reliance on general population figures was improper "under the pre-Harris authorities,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Myers v. Ylst
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.