Wright v. Brown’s Empirical Analysis
1975
Citation profile
8 district · 189 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 197 later decisions — most recently July 2019 · most notably Gordon v. Bridgeport Housing Authority (1988), Shore v. Town of Stonington (1982)
8 district · 189 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Kellems v. Brown · Rossignol v. Danbury School of Aeronautics, Inc. · Ross Realty Corp. v. Surkis · United Aircraft Corporation v. Fusari · Kostyal v. Cass
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 197 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'refers to [one] which is to be performed in a prescribed manner without the exercise of judgment or discretion.'”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage“[l]iability in nuisance can be imposed on a municipality only if the condition constituting the nuisance was created by the positive act of the municipality”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage“First, the plaintiff must be within the class of persons protected by the statute. [ Coughlin v. Peters , 153 Conn. 99 , 101 , 214 A.2d 127 (1965)]; Hassett v. Palmer , 126 Conn. 468 , 473 , 12 A.2d 646 [1940]; Monroe v. Hartford Street Ry. Co. , 76 Conn. 201 , 207 , 56 A. 498 (1903). Second, the injury must be of the type which the statute was intended to prevent. Toomey v. Danaher , 161 Conn. 204 , 212 , 286 A.2d 293 [1971]; Longstean v. McCaffrey's Sons , 95 Conn. 486 , 36; Restatement (Second), 2 Torts 286, 288.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.