In re Dana’s Empirical Analysis
167 F. 529 · 1909
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions (4 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 1977
5 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on In re Schermerhorn · In re Eppstein
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Tbe principal question arising on this petition to revise is whether a District Court of the United States, in which proceedings in’ bankruptcy are pending, and which is in tlie actual possession of certain real property conceded to belong to the bankrupt, has jurisdiction to determine the amount and order of priority of liens thereon, and to liquidate such liens, to-the end that the property may be sold free of incumbrances, and in aid i.hereof to enjoin the lienholders from prosecuting the foreclosure of their liens in a suit brought in a state court before the commencement of the bankruptcy proceedings, but within four months thereof; and this, though the lienholders object to such jurisdiction, and it is not contended that their liens are preferential or fraudulent, or invalid for any other reason.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In re Donnelly
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.