Harnik v. Lilley’s Empirical Analysis
167 F.2d 159 · 1948
Citation profile
24 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently December 1972 · most notably Price v. Sinnott (1969), Een v. Consolidated Freightways (1955)
24 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Minnehaha County v. Kelley · Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'n v. Bowman · Emanuel v. Kansas City Title & Trust Co. · Dinet v. Rapid City · Home Ins. v. Tydal Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ * * * no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court in the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.