Sullivan v. Mosser’s Empirical Analysis
167 F.2d 440 · 1948
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Relies on Pepper v. Litton · Case v. Los Angeles Lumber Products Co. · Young v. Higbee Co. · American United Mut Life Ins Co v. City of Avon Park Fla · Price v. Gurney
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““A more serious question is whether the court could exercise such power without notice to the certificate holders and without according them an opportunity to be heard. It is the generally established rule in Illinois, and we think elsewhere, that in all actions concerning trust property the beneficiaries are necessary parties. Illinois National Bank of Springfield v. Gwinn, 390 Ill. 345 , 61 N.E.2d 249 , 159 A.L.R. 468 ; People’s Bank & Trust Co. of Rockford v. Gregory, 347 Ill. 397 , 398, 399, 179 N.E. 856 ; Martin v. Frank, 259 Ill.App. 417 , 424.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.