Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 167 F.3d 1189 - United States v. Fields

United States v. Fields’s Empirical Analysis

167 F.3d 1189 · 1999

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
June 2017
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently June 2017

6 federal appellate · 1 district ·

70199920002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Neil v. Biggers · Manson v. Brathwaite · United States v. Johnson · United States v. Johnson · United States v. Eisenberg

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the suggestive procedures created a 'very substantial likelihood of irreparable misidentification.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “serious potential risk of physical injury to another,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.