Barnett v. Lemaster’s Empirical Analysis
167 F.3d 1321 · 1999
Citation profile
21 federal appellate · 5 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 77 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 2015 · most notably Carey Warden v. Saffold (2002), Ronnie Lee Gibson v. Ken Klinger - (2000)
21 federal appellate · 5 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Houston v. Lack · Picard v. Connor · Borja v. Immigration and Naturalization Service Briones · De Rodulfa v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 77 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“attempting, through proper use of state court procedures, to exhaust state court remedies”
12 later decisions quote this exact passage“[t]he time during which a properly filed application for State post-conviction or other collateral review with respect to the pertinent judgment or claim is pending shall not be counted toward any period of limitation under this subsection.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.