Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 167 F.3d 139 - Mazzeo v. J

Mazzeo v. J’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

72
cited by 72 later decisions
May 2019
most recently cited

12 federal appellate · 3 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 72 later decisions — most recently May 2019 · most notably Jackson v. Federal Express (2014), Bdc Llc v. Bdc Llc Dwf (2003)

12 federal appellate · 3 district ·

390199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Alaska v. United States · Kelley v. Everglades Drainage District · Mayo v. Lakeland Highlands Canning Co. · Sonnax Industries, Inc. v. Tri Component Products Corp. · Pch Associates Liona Corporation Inc v. Pch Associates Pch

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 72 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) whether relief would result in a partial or complete resolution of the issues; (2) lack of any connection with or interference with the bankruptcy case; (3) whether the other proceeding involves the debtor as a fiduciary; (4) whether a specialized tribunal with the necessary expertise has been established to hear the cause of action; (5) whether the debtor’s insurer has assumed full responsibility for defending it; (6) whether the action primarily involves third parties; (7) whether litigation in another forum would prejudice the interests of other creditors; (8) whether the judgment claim arising from the other action is subject to equitable subordination; (9) whether movant’s success in the other proceeding would result in a judicial lien avoidable by the debtor; (10) the interests of judicial economy and the expeditious and economical resolution of litigation; (11) whether the parties are ready for trial in the other proceeding; and (12) impact of the stay on the parties and the balance of harms.”
    26 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “An order of a district court functioning in its capacity as an appellate court in a bankruptcy case is subject to plenary review.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “and where such findings and conclusions are lacking, we may vacate and remand.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.