Sloan v. Sharp

Decided Feb. 4, 1999.

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently February 1999

1 federal appellate ·

3 counsel of record

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1999-02-04

¶1Summary Calendar.

¶2Patrick J. Gilpin, Patrick J. Gilpin & Associates, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

¶3 *208James C. Todd, Asst. Atty. Gen., Austin, TX, for Sharp, State of Texas and Comptroller of Public Accounts.

¶4Adrian L. Young, Austin, TX, for Wiley.

¶5ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

¶6Before DUHÉ, DeMOSS and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

¶7PER CURIAM:

¶8This matter is before us on remand from the United States Supreme Court. Sloan v. Sharp, - U.S. -, 119 S.Ct. 32, 142 L.Ed.2d 24 (1998).

¶9It is ORDERED that the judgment of the district court is VACATED, and the matter is REMANDED to the district court for further proceedings in light of Faragher v. City of Boca Raton, 524 U.S. 775, 118 S.Ct. 2275, 141 L.Ed.2d 662 (1998); and Burlington Industries, Inc., v. Ellerth, 742 U.S. 524, 118 S.Ct. 2257, 141 L.Ed.2d 633 (1998).

¶10VACATED and REMANDED.