Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 167 F.3d 286 - Smith v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

Smith v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

167 F.3d 286 · 1999

Citation profile

68
cited by 68 later decisions
2
states following
April 2022
most recently cited

18 federal appellate · 4 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 68 later decisions — most recently April 2022 · most notably Cockrel v. Shelby County School District (2001), Lewis v. B & R CORPORATION (2001)

18 federal appellate · 4 district · 3 state decisions

5001999200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 12101 (§ 2 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990) · 42 U.S.C. § 12188 (§ 308 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000A · 45 U.S.C. § 1

Relies on Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation · Lau's Corp., Inc. v. Haskins · Robinson v. Kroger Co. · Alterman Foods, Inc. v. Ligon

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 68 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “draw our own inferences and legal conclusions from the record.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.