Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 167 F.3d 299 - United States v. Thomas

United States v. Thomas’s Empirical Analysis

167 F.3d 299 · 1999

Citation profile

53
cited by 53 later decisions
4
states following
May 2025
most recently cited

17 federal appellate · 10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 53 later decisions — most recently May 2025 · most notably United States v. Schreane (2003), United States v. Robbins (1999)

17 federal appellate · 10 state decisions

3301999200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 18 U.S.C. § 841 (Amendments of 1973 to Federal Law) · 21 U.S.C. § 846 (§ 406 of the Controlled Substances Act)

Relies on Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · Barker v. Wingo · Doggett v. United States · United States v. Scheffer · United States v. Loud Hawk

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 53 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “so narrow in scope as to preclude the district court from considering the issue a second time,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “repeatedly held that 'unilaterally obtained polygraph evidence is almost never admissible under Evidence Rule 403.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “A defendant's failure to assert his rights in a timely fashion weighs heavily against his Sixth Amendment claim.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.