Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 167 F.3d 466 - Bailey v. Runyon

Bailey v. Runyon’s Empirical Analysis

167 F.3d 466 · 1999

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
August 2017
most recently cited

14 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently August 2017

14 federal appellate · 2 district ·

150199920002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc. · Faragher v. City of Boca Raton · Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc. · Monge v. California · Allied Chemical Corporation v. Daiflon Inc

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “assume all conflicts in the evidence were resolved in [appellant's] favor ..., assume as proved all facts that [her] evidence tended to prove, and give [her] the benefit of all favorable inferences that may reasonably be drawn from the facts proved.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Because the law places a high standard on overturning a jury verdict, JAML is proper 'only when there is a complete absence of probative facts to support the conclusion reached' so that no reasonable juror could have found for the nonmoving party.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “when all the evidence points in one direction and is susceptible to no reasonable interpretation supporting the jury verdict.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.