Callier v. Gray’s Empirical Analysis
167 F.3d 977 · 1999
Citation profile
11 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently September 2014 · most notably Days Inns Worldwide, Inc. v. Patel (2006), Diane Conetta Peter Conetta/cross v. National Hair Care Centers Inc/cross (2001)
11 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Thomas v. Arn · United States v. Raddatz · Mathews v. Weber · Gomez v. United States · Wingo v. Wedding
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a] magistrate assigned ... to hear a pretrial matter dispositive of a claim or defense of a party . . . shall promptly conduct such proceedings as are required.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“additional basis for jurisdiction of the magistrate judge on the damages dispute,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“proposed findings of fact and recommendations for . . . disposition”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.