Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 167 F.3d 977 - Callier v. Gray

Callier v. Gray’s Empirical Analysis

167 F.3d 977 · 1999

Citation profile

36
cited by 36 later decisions
September 2014
most recently cited

11 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently September 2014 · most notably Days Inns Worldwide, Inc. v. Patel (2006), Diane Conetta Peter Conetta/cross v. National Hair Care Centers Inc/cross (2001)

11 federal appellate · 2 district ·

260199920002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Thomas v. Arn · United States v. Raddatz · Mathews v. Weber · Gomez v. United States · Wingo v. Wedding

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a] magistrate assigned ... to hear a pretrial matter dispositive of a claim or defense of a party . . . shall promptly conduct such proceedings as are required.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “additional basis for jurisdiction of the magistrate judge on the damages dispute,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “proposed findings of fact and recommendations for . . . disposition”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.