United States v. Durant’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1324 (§ 274 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on United States v. Booker · United States v. Olano · United States v. Mares · Unitherm Food Systems, Inc. v. Swift-Eckrich, Inc. · United States v. Valenzuela-Quevedo
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“had agreed to pay between $1,000 and $1,200 upon their arrival in Houston”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.