Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 167 FRD 147 - Zapata v. IBP, Inc.

Zapata v. IBP, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

38
cited by 38 later decisions
3
states following
January 2013
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 17 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently January 2013 · most notably Allison v. Citgo Petroleum Corp. (1998), Zachery v. Texaco Exploration & Production, Inc. (1999)

1 federal appellate · 17 district · 3 state decisions

280199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (Civil Rights Act of 1866) · 42 U.S.C. § 1988 · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 706 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)

Relies on Eisen v. Carlisle & Jacquelin · General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. Falcon · Patterson v. McLean Credit Union · Rivers v. Roadway Express, Inc. · CPC International Inc. v. Dimmitt Agri Industries, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “devolve into a series of individual trials on issues peculiar to each plaintiff”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.