Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

167 F.R.D. 88

Luce v. Dalton

U.S. District Court

Decided June 18, 1996

U.S. District Court · decided 1996-06-18

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently September 1999

1 state decisions

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 636

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1996-06-18

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER AFFIRMING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S DECISION

MOSKOWITZ, District Judge.

¶2Plaintiff Leon W. Luce appeals the order of United States Magistrate Judge Anthony J. Battaglia, filed April 2, 1996, denying Plaintiffs motion to amend his Complaint. The motion was referred to Magistrate Judge Battaglia pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A). The present appeal was brought pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 72. After reviewing Plaintiffs objections and notice of lodgement filed in support of his appeal, and upon review of the record, the Court finds this matter suitable for decision without oral argument pursuant to Local Rule 7.1(d)(1).

¶3After reviewing the record, the Court finds that the Magistrate Judge’s order is not clearly erroneous or contrary to law. Therefore, it is hereby ordered that the Magistrate Judge’s decision is AFFIRMED.

¶4IT IS SO ORDERED.

/167/frd/88 · .json · Public domain