Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 167 FSUPP2D 1021 - United States v. Genova

United States v. Genova’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
February 2006
most recently cited

2 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1346 · 18 U.S.C. § 1623 · 18 U.S.C. § 1961 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 666

Relies on Pinkerton v. United States · Bourjaily v. United States · United States v. Powell · United States v. Gaudin · McNally v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In the specific attorney fees kickback scheme established by the Government, Gulotta’s and Genova’s repeated respective payment and receipt of bribery funds for non-existent legal work constituted appropriate racketeering acts on multiple levels.... Both Genova and Gulotta knowingly conducted and participated in the conduct of the affairs of Calumet City through a pattern of illegal activities which included repeated violations of the mail fraud and Illinois Bribery and Official Misconduct Statutes throughout a three-year period. Throughout these repeated racketeering acts, Calumet City was used as an enterprise by Genova and Gulotta to conduct illegal activities.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[bjoth Genova and Gulotta had clear conflicts of interest ... created by their secret and illegal economic partnership,” in violation of Calumet City Municipal Code § 2-22. Id. at 1040. Third, this Court's findings of fact specifically stated that”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “knowingly and willfully gave false material testimony during the trial,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.