Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 167 F. Supp. 2d 692 - Intel Corp. v. Broadcom Corp.

167 F. Supp. 2d 692 - Intel Corp. v. Broadcom Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
July 2016
most recently cited

19 district ·

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1404 · 35 U.S.C. § 271

Relies on International Shoe Co. v. Washington · Burger King Corporation v. Rudzewicz · World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. Woodson · Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. Hall · Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[Defendant] is a multi-billion dollar company that does business on an international scale. Furthermore, the conveniences of modern travel and communication technology have made it more difficult to argue that litigating in a particular forum is inconvenient for the parties and witnesses. Therefore, to meet its burden [defendant] must establish that litigating this case in Delaware will pose a unique or unusual burden on [its] business operations. It has not done so.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “(1) Transacts any business or performs any character of work or service in the State; (2) Contracts to supply services or things in this State;”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Causes tortious injury in [Delaware] or outside of [Delaware] by an act or omission outside [of Delaware] if the person regularly does or solicits business, engages in any other persistent course of conduct in [Delaware] or derives substantial revenue from services, or things used or consumed in [Delaware.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.