Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

167 Ga. App. 113

Smith v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 23, 1983

Court of Appeals of Georgia · decided 1983-06-23

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently April 1988

5 state decisions

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Anders v. California · 153 Ga. App. 35 - Baldwin v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1983-06-23

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Shulman, Chief Judge.

¶1Appellant was convicted of two counts of armed robbery and one count of burglary. His attorney filed a motion to withdraw as counsel pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (87 SC 1396, 18 LE2d 493). In accordance with Anders, counsel has filed a brief raising points of law which he considered could arguably support an appeal. We are in agreement with counsel that none of the points raised, though persuasively presented, has any merit. We have therefore granted the motion to withdraw. In addition, we have fully examined the record and transcript to determine independently if there are any meritorious errors of law. We have found none. We are satisfied that the evidence produced at trial was sufficient to authorize any rational trier of fact to find appellant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of the crimes charged. Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560); Baldwin v. State, 153 Ga. App. 35, 37 (264 SE2d 528).

¶2Judgment affirmed.

McMurray, P. J., and Birdsong, J., concur.
/167/gaapp/113 · .json · Public domain