Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 167 ILL 46 - Smith v. Goodrich

Smith v. Goodrich’s Empirical Analysis

1897

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
5
states following
December 1934
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently December 1934

10 state decisions

5018971900191019201930decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedSmith v. Knox Goodrich

Relationships

Relies on McGarvey v. Darnall

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The holder of the note, who, for his own benefit, had the deed and note placed as an escrow, had a right to waive the advantage he had by the retention of the deed, and allow it to be delivered.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.