Taylor v. Strayer’s Empirical Analysis
1906
Citation profile
46 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 46 later decisions — most recently August 2013 · most notably Thorn v. Silver (1909), Indianapolis Union Railway Co. v. Waddington (1907)
46 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co. v. Illinois ex rel. Drainage Commissioners · Chicago Burlington Quincy Railway Company v. People of the State of Illinois I O Grimwood F L · Sharp v. Malia · Trittipo v. Beaver · Bonfoy v. Goar
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““No right to construct an artificial drain over the lands of others exists at common law. Drainage statutes are given or withheld in the discretion of the legislature, and when enacted may be modified or repealed at the pleasure of that body. It follows that one legislature cannot determine the policy of its successor and forestall action which may be deemed expedient to protect the public health or to promote the public welfare. ... It is a well-settled principle that when a right of action, not existing at common law, is given by statute, a repeal of the statute without saving pending actions takes away the right of action in pending causes, Which have not proceeded to final judgment.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Heath v. Fennig““The effect of a repealing statute, I take to be to obliterate the statute repealed as completely from the records of parliament as if it had never passed, and that it must be considered as a law that never existed, except for the purposes of those actions or suits which were commenced, prosecuted, and concluded while it was an existing law.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Heath v. Fennig
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.