Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 167 IND 622 - Hord v. State

Hord v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1907

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
3
states following
December 2013
most recently cited

2 district · 26 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently December 2013 · most notably State ex rel. Workman v. Goldthait (1909), State v. Mutual Life Insurance (1910)

2 district · 26 state decisions

100190719101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Whiteside v. United States · Delafield v. State · Schneck v. City of Jeffersonville · City of Indianapolis v. Wann · Mayor of Balto. v. Reynolds

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"... Not having authority to continue the employment of appellant beyond his official term, no legal liability rests on the state to pay for the services rendered... ." "... The general and well-affirmed rule is that, in the absence of some statutory provision to the contrary, the commission or appointment of a deputy officer runs or continues only during the term of the officer making the appointment. Of course, in the absence of a statute to the contrary, the principal has the right, at his pleasure, to remove his deputy.... The doctrine that the term of a deputy will expire at the close of the term of his principal is well affirmed by the following authorities: [Citing cases.]"”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “"... Or, in other words, the statute did not contemplate that such employment should continue until the work to be performed by the assistants was completed, although the completion thereof might extend long beyond the term of the Attorney-General making the appointment... ."”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “... Not having authority to continue the employment of appellant beyond his official term, no legal liability rests on the state to pay for the services rendered... .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.