Stark v. Lamb’s Empirical Analysis
1906
Citation profile
12 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently January 1983
12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Taylor v. Duesterberg · Jeffersonville Water Supply Co. v. Riter · Faurote v. Carr · Wallace v. Lawyer · Moss v. Jenkins
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““It is quite well settled that property exempt from execution is not subject to the claims of creditors, and may be transferred by the owner, unaffected by any such claims. The owner having a right to hold property exempt from the demands of his creditors has an absolute and unhampered right to transfer the same, and in doing so cannot legally be charged 'with defrauding his creditors or with an intent to do so. Faurote v. Carr (1886), 108 Ind. 123, 125 ; Taylor v. Duesterberg (1887), 109 Ind. 165, 170 ; Barnard v. Brown (1887), 112 Ind. 53 .; Citizens State Bank v. Harris (1897), 149 Ind. 208 .” (Our italics.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Stamper v. Stamper
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.