Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 167 KY 608 - Rose v. Cecil

Rose v. Cecil’s Empirical Analysis

1916

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
April 1950
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently April 1950

6 state decisions

2019161920193019401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Every material allegation of a pleading must, for the purposes of the action, be taken as true, unless specifically traversed.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.