Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 167 Md. 523 - State v. Coblentz

State v. Coblentz’s Empirical Analysis

1934

Citation profile

35
cited by 35 later decisions
1
states following
March 1996
most recently cited

2 district · 33 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently March 1996 · most notably Jones v. State (1985), Ayre v. State (1981)

2 district · 33 state decisions

1201934194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Coblentz v. State · State v. Lassotovitch · Bosco v. State · Cearfoss v. State · Jules v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the fact that the words [of the indictment] may leave unspecified one or more essential elements of the crime”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “sufficient to meet the practical needs which an indictment is intended to supply....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “untruthful representations of its affairs, assets or liabilities.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.