Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 167 MICH 349 - Johnson v. Burke

Johnson v. Burke’s Empirical Analysis

1911

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
September 1940
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently September 1940

1 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

201911192019301940decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hunn v. Michigan Central Railroad · Ashman v. Flint & Pere Marquette Railroad · Haywood v. Johnson · Eastman v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. · Fluhrer v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““After a defendant in a transitory action has pleaded in bar of the action, and thus submitted himself to the jurisdiction of a court of general jurisdiction, he must be held to have waived the question of jurisdiction of the person.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.