¶1 Appeal from judgment of conviction of selling intoxicating liquor. The one assignment of error questions the sufficiency of the evidence and is without merit. The only witness was the purchaser. He was not an accomplice. State v. Brand, 124 Minn. 408, 145 N. W. 39; State v. Tremont, 160 Minn. 314, 315, 200 N. W. 93; 16 C. J. 683. The weight of his testimony was for the trier of fact.
¶2 Judgment affirmed.